<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Web 2.0</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/tag/web-2-0"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://pingv.com/taxonomy/term/223/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://pingv.com/taxonomy/term/223/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2006-03-24T11:14:13-06:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>OSCMS: Building Communities</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200703/oscms-building-communities" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200703/oscms-building-communities</id>
    <published>2007-03-23T01:16:53-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-06T15:58:29-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="community" />
    <category term="Drupal" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>During <a href="http://2007.oscms-summit.org/node/237">"my" session on Building Communities, at the OSCMS Summit</a>, one of the participants, Cathy Aster, generously spent the hour filling the dry-erase with erasable writing that captured the essence of the discussion.</p>
<p>And it <em>was</em> a good discussion. I hardly said anything! Which made room for lots of great insights and observations. Nothing like a roomful of community leaders to engage in community discussion!</p>
<p>Anyway, at the end I snapped some pics of the board. I won't bother trying to interpret the notes, but perhaps it will be helpful to those attending.</p>
<p>Ezra took some notes on the session, and he'll be posting those soon.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Some modest OSCMS Summit proposals: Theming Drupal, and on building communities</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200702/some-modest-oscms-summit-proposals-theming-drupal-and-on-building-communities" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200702/some-modest-oscms-summit-proposals-theming-drupal-and-on-building-communities</id>
    <published>2007-02-14T18:37:34-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-17T14:50:03-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="community" />
    <category term="conferences" />
    <category term="design" />
    <category term="Drupal" />
    <category term="Open Source" />
    <category term="OSCMS Summit" />
    <category term="theming" />
    <category term="trends" />
    <category term="usability" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <category term="Yahoo" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>The other day, I proposed facilitating a discussion at the<a href="http://2007.oscms-summit.org"> Open Source CMS Summit 2007, hosted by Yahoo</a>:</p>
<blockquote><h3><a href="http://2007.oscms-summit.org/node/237">Building community online</a></h3>
<p>Community building is more than just software, and more than just people. The nature of online communities is changing, no longer defined exclusively by bulletin boards or superblogs.</p>
<p>This is a session for everyone where we can discuss what it is that makes for a rich and robust community -- from the perspective of web developer, designer, evangelist, organization, member....</p>
<p>What have you done that has worked well? What have you seen elsewhere that you liked? What are people buzzing about? What Drupal modules (and/or other CMS or social networking tools) have you used in community sites?</p>
<p>Taking a broader approach, what do we mean when we say "community"? Can we even limit the concept to single sites?</p></blockquote>
<p>The idea behind this is obvious to most: If you build it, will they come? And if they do, will they stay <i>and participate</i>?</p>
<p>I'm hoping that, should this proposal be accepted, a lot of people with rich experience in building and/or administering community sites will come and share their insights, especially about where we see things going.</p>
<p>If you're going to the Summit, maybe you'd like to express <a href="http://2007.oscms-summit.org/node/237">whether you're interested</a>?</p>
<p><a href="http://pingv.com/about-us/people">Greg, Ezra</a> and I have also submitted a proposal for a session on theming for Drupal.</p>
<blockquote><h3><a href="http://2007.oscms-summit.org/node/227">Theming Drupal: techniques, approaches, philosophies</a></h3>
<p>A presentation panel on ways to implement web design theming in Drupal.</p>
<p>Drupal and its resplendent contributed modules push content of all kinds out to the web page. This session will start with a run-down on some of the various tags and pre-formatting Drupal generates by default, and easy ways to spruce up what comes "out of the box."</p>
<p>Next will be going over ways to change and customize the content presentation in more aggressive ways, using phpTemplate overrides and CSS. (And Javascript?)</p>
<p>Also addressed will be newer concepts of CSS usage and implementation, including semantic naming conventions, microformats and <a href="http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/and_all_that_transcending_css_malarkey.html">Transcending CSS</a> when facing the challenges of coping with wide varieties of dynamically generated content in a CMS. (E.g., why, when and how to split up your theme into different stylesheets for different browsers and media.)</p>
<p>Finally, we will look to the future and where Drupal 6, 7, etc. are taking us in the next generation of Drupal templating.</p>
<p>The balance of focus between these areas may shift with questions, expressions of interests and levels of expertise in the room.</p>
<p>Related but probably not covered: Usability and Drupal.</p></blockquote>
<p>So far, <a href="http://2007.oscms-summit.org/node/227">the voting on this</a> has been favorable. It's more geeky in focus, which in a way makes me more nervous and yet more excited. I'm truly hoping for some help from others on this, especially when it comes to plans for the Drupal 6+ ways of templating, which I know enough about to be very intrigued but hesitate to speak about in any leadership capacity.</p>
<p>The last note in the description, about usability, really breaks my heart, as it has become a major passion of mine over the past year. Fortunately, theming wizard <a href="http://2007.oscms-summit.org/node/340">Steven Wittens has proposed a session</a> on just design "from a geek perspective," where I can get my fix and we OSCMS geeks can (hopefully) collectively fill the gap in usability coverage.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Web 2.0 in so many words (or less)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200702/web-2-0-in-so-many-words-or-less" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200702/web-2-0-in-so-many-words-or-less</id>
    <published>2007-02-12T14:33:04-06:00</published>
    <updated>2007-02-12T15:55:55-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Drupal" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>One question we run into when talking to people about Drupal web development over the past several years is, "What <i>is</i> 'Web 2.0,' anyway?" <a href="http://knaddison.com/technology/movie-your-morning-coffee">Greg has found</a> as clear and concise an answer as any I've seen, and without all the blah blah blah....</p>
<object width="400" height="329"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6gmP4nk0EOE" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6gmP4nk0EOE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="400" height="329"></embed></object><p>
If you prefer more info and context, then here's another video perhaps more to your liking....</p>
<p>&lt;!--break--></p>
<object width="400" height="329"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nsa5ZTRJQ5w" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nsa5ZTRJQ5w" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="400" height="329"></embed></object>     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Yahoo and Microsoft adopt Google sitemap standard</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200611/yahoo-and-microsoft-adopt-google-sitemap-standard" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200611/yahoo-and-microsoft-adopt-google-sitemap-standard</id>
    <published>2006-11-16T09:24:04-06:00</published>
    <updated>2006-11-16T13:01:00-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Drupal" />
    <category term="Google" />
    <category term="Internet" />
    <category term="Microsoft" />
    <category term="Modules" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <category term="Yahoo" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>One of the more interesting developments in search engine indexing of websites in this "web 2.0" era has been the advent of the sitemap — a special file listing all website urls, maintained by the website's own administrator. With dynamically generated content being added and updated constantly, it only made sense to help out the search engines, to make sure that they didn't miss anything. The only catch was that they all had their standards.</p>
<p>Now <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/15/google-yahoo-and-microsoft-agree-to-standard-sitemaps-protocol/">they've finally united</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In an encouraging act of collaboration, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft announced tonight that they will all begin using the same Sitemaps protocol to index sites around the web. Now based at <a href="http://www.sitemaps.org">Sitemaps.org</a>, the system instructs web masters on how to install an XML file on their servers that all three engines can use to track updates to pages. This should make it easier to get your pages indexed in a simple and standardized way. People who use Google Sitemaps don’t need to change anything, those maps will now be indexed by Yahoo and Microsoft.</p></blockquote>
<p>Marshall Kirkpatrick adds:</p>
<blockquote><p>Any time competitors agree on open standards, that’s an enabler of further innovation and something to celebrate. It’s also great to see <a href="http://creativecommons.org">Creative Commons</a> receiving all the more validation.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is good news for people with Drupal-powered websites, for the <a href="http://drupal.org/project/gsitemap">contributed module Google Sitemap</a> does the proper indexing automatically already — only now Yahoo and Microsoft will read that file, too!</p>
<p>— meaning it's a good day to be a Drupalista!</p>
<p>Site owners may want to make sure their sitemaps aren't missed by submitting their sitemaps to <a href="http://search.yahoo.com/info/submit.html">Yahoo</a> and <a href="http://search.msn.com/docs/submit.aspx">Microsoft</a> and help them (and themselves) out.<br />
<i><br />
[Added hat tip to <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/061116-000001">Danny Sullivan</a>.]</i></p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Drupal 5.0 Beta 1 released this morning</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200610/drupal-5-0-beta-1-released-this-morning" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200610/drupal-5-0-beta-1-released-this-morning</id>
    <published>2006-10-31T11:55:45-06:00</published>
    <updated>2006-10-31T11:55:46-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Web" />
    <category term="Web Design" />
    <category term="Drupal" />
    <category term="Open Source" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>People can download it <a href="http://drupal.org/project/Drupal+project">here</a> (or use <a href="http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/drupal/files/projects/drupal-5.0-beta1.tar.gz">this direct link to the .tar.gz file</a>.)</p>
<p>There probably will be a couple of betas after this, followed by a couple of release candidates before the official release of Drupal 5.0. Starting in the next couple of weeks, we'll start using Drupal 5.0 as the development foundation for new sites we develop that won't launch before December or January and don't depend heavily on the hundreds of the contributed modules in the Drupal community. For sites wanting a lot of those functions, we'll either work off of Drupal 4.7 or work module upgrades into the sites' development processes.</p>
<p>We'll review Drupal 5.0 in the coming days and weeks and post a run-down of some highlights. Existing clients and other Drupal users might want to consider planning for an upgrade sometime in the first half of next year.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Pew, and when is a blog a blog?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200607/on-pew-and-when-is-a-blog-a-blog" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200607/on-pew-and-when-is-a-blog-a-blog</id>
    <published>2006-07-21T17:51:35-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-07T09:23:55-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Web" />
    <category term="blogging" />
    <category term="community" />
    <category term="Drupal" />
    <category term="Internet" />
    <category term="Pew" />
    <category term="trends" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>There's much buzz about the new report from the <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/index.asp">Pew Internet &#38; American Life Project</a> written by Amanda Lenhart, Senior Research Specialist, and Susannah Fox, Associate Director, titled <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/186/report_display.asp">Bloggers: A portrait of the internet's new storytellers</a> (<a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP%20Bloggers%20Report%20July%2019%202006.pdf">pdf</a>). One of the highlights that many have glommed on to is that:</p>
<blockquote><p>Thirty-nine percent of internet users, or about 57 million American adults, read blogs – a significant increase since the fall of 2005.</p></blockquote>
<p>This factoid led me to a question: When <em>is</em> a blog a blog? Or, to put it another way, when is a website just a website and <em>not</em> a blog?</p>
<p>We're building Drupal-powered websites all the time that <em>have</em> blogs but wouldn't necessarily be <em>called</em> "blogs." Are they not-blogs, then? I'm not asking this to be persnickety, but to question the assumption that just because people <em>say</em> they read blogs (which is what the study is based on -- what people say they do) doesn't mean that those who don't <em>say</em> it aren't <em>doing</em> it. Blogs are websites, and for many people on the internet, despite all the old media hype over "the bloggers" (read: "those (darn) bloggers"), a blog is just a word they may have heard but is not something they would recognize if they saw it.</p>
<p>Could it be that <em>more</em> than 57 million Americans read blogs? Almost certainly, though probably they don't all realize it. Consider:</p>
<blockquote><p>Only 18% of bloggers offer an RSS feed of their blog's content.</p></blockquote>
<p>My guess is that it's more like 98%, but that most bloggers just don't realize it.</p>
<p>But anyway....</p>
<p>Let's go around the virtual table of bloggers and see what some of them think. <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/07/blogging_is_the.html">Seth Godin says</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>What I found interesting is that more than half of all bloggers are doing it for themselves. (Always a good reason to do something). In other words, it's not for commercial gain or to find a large audience of strangers. Instead, it's a form of self-expression, a chance to be creative or share some ideas.</p></blockquote>
<p>But <a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/2006/07/why-we-blog.html">Ann Althouse offers a different reponse</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I'm surprised the number is that low, especially considering the likelihood of saying this as a modest or disingenuous characterization of what you're doing if you haven't got many readers. But maybe not. What would novelists in a survey say about why they write? I think the delusion that they've got a best-seller in the making is pretty widespread. But we bloggers are a saner lot... right?</p></blockquote>
<p>On HorsePigCow, <a href="http://www.horsepigcow.com/2006/07/smart.html">Miss Rogue explains</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>This is a niche. It's a rockin' cool niche, but it's a niche. MySpace...that's a niche, too. It's a big frickin' niche, but it's a niche of young-ish (mostly) people who want to live their lives online. Awesome <a href="http://www.murketing.com/journal/?p=67">article over on Murketing</a> (via <a href="http://www.brianoberkirch.com/?p=31">Brian Oberkirch</a>) about there alotta big niches, too. But one thing we can agree on is that there is no monolithic mass that is mindlessly consuming crap.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2006/07/ooh-tell-me-more.html">Shakespeare's Sister offers</a> a snarkier response:</p>
<blockquote><p>The study also reportedly found that most bloggers know how to type, sometimes post square-shaped items known as “pictures,” and are the most likely group of people to know what a Cleveland Steamer is.</p></blockquote>
<p>On Ars Technica, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060719-7297.html">Nate Anderson takes away</a> from the report:</p>
<blockquote><p>Though most of them are under 30 (natch), a surprising 46 percent are older. Unlike video games, the blogging demographic is evenly split between men and women, but those men and women tend to live in the suburbs. Only one third of all bloggers live in urban centers, and 13 percent come from rural areas.</p>
<p>Bloggers are also less white than the US Internet population as a whole. While 74 percent of general 'Net users are white, only 60 percent of bloggers are, meaning that blogs are helping to provide a creative outlet for a broad spectrum of Americans. </p></blockquote>
<p>On BlogHer, <a href="http://blogher.org/node/7891">Marianne Richmond notes</a> that Pew included its methodology.</p>
<blockquote><p>Also, in contrast to some recently released reports on blogging such as the <a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/press:press_release/2006/id=06.06.26-corporate_weblogs.html">Jupiter report</a> on corporate blogging, the methodology was included with the <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/130/press_release.asp">Pew press release</a>. <a href="http://bloombergmarketing.blogs.com/bloomberg_marketing/2006/07/what_are_blogge.html">Toby Bloomberg</a> has been documenting this disappointing lack of substantiation from Jupiter.</p></blockquote>
<p>Marianne also points to B.L. Ochman, <a href="http://www.whatsnextblog.com/archives/2006/07/ive_got_the_quoted_out_of_context_in_dead_tree_media_blues.asp">who apparently was misquoted</a> by the Washington Post in <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071901900.html">their article</a> on the Pew study:</p>
<blockquote><p>Many in mainstream still media don't want to accept that bloggers are doing something more than wasting time. And the more they put down blogging, the farther away from the sea change it has spearheaded and the conversation that has bypassed them. <strong>While the Pew report did say that the 233 bloggers it surveyed mostly blog as a hobby, it also noted more interesting and germane information:</strong></p>
<p>- 27 % blog to influence what others think<br />
- 7 % blog to make money (but that's a flawed premise because they don't define what "making money" means in this context)<br />
- 34 % blog to share practical knowledge or skills with others,<br />
- 29% blog to motivate other people to action<br />
- 52% blog to express themselves creatively</p>
<p><strong>Add up those numbers, and you see that bloggers freely share information with the hope of motivating people to action and influencing what others think, and that, in a nutshell, is how the conversation began and why it has grown to such epic proportions. </strong></p>
<p><em>[emphasis in original]</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This, I feel, gets to the essence of what is (watch out! here comes that buzz-word!) "Web 2.0" is about -- people making connections -- and it's a trend that is happening across the board, not just in business or in politics....</p>
<p>...or in journalism.  <a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/07/blog_motivation.html">Notes Steve Rubel</a> on Micro Persuasion:</p>
<blockquote><p>Regardless of what the research says, even if citizen journalism does not drive the majority of bloggers, those who do "practice" it are certainly influencing the mainstream media in a big way. If the blogopshere doesn't add another citizen journalist, it will always help shape what the mainstream media covers.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, it does have ramifications for PR. This means that the smaller universe of bloggers who do break and/or comment on news will bear the brunt of pitches from the public relations community. The online media is dividing into three strata - the mainstream media, news blogs and expressionist blogs. The first two categories are where the PR community should focus.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.webpronews.com/2006a/0720.html">Jason Lee Miller writes</a> on WebProNews:</p>
<blockquote><p>So could the slings and arrows that Nietzsche bewailed of the pre-Web society be avoided though this new collective individualism?</p>
<p>"Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule."</p>
<p>The optimist will believe we've struck a balance between the mob and the self. The cynic will no doubt recall the blog swarm and laugh. And the marketers and public relations professionals will understand and lament them both, as their audience expands in context, in complexity, but also in reactivity.</p></blockquote>
<p>On BlogWrite for CEOs, <a href="http://www.blogwriteforceos.com/blogwrite/2006/07/corporate_blogg.html">Debbie Weil sums up</a> her perspective:</p>
<blockquote><p>Reading between the lines of Pew's latest report on blogging, it's clear that corporate or business blogging still occupies its own tiny - but evolving - niche in the blogosphere. Don't be fooled, however. Despite the findings below, blogs *will* become a mainstream business communications strategy. The "instant publishing" nature of blogs - so attractive to the under-30s - is just as useful for companies that want to connect with customers.</p></blockquote>
<p>With <a href="http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000419.html">the number of blogs doubling every 5-6 months</a>, we can probably expect all these findings to shift and change right before our eyes, and more will be around to blog about it.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BlogHer site scaling as the Conference approaches</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200607/blogher-site-scaling-as-the-conference-approaches" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/blog/laura/200607/blogher-site-scaling-as-the-conference-approaches</id>
    <published>2006-07-19T13:48:42-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-07T09:20:05-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Hosting" />
    <category term="Web" />
    <category term="Partners" />
    <category term="blogging" />
    <category term="Blogher" />
    <category term="Blogher06" />
    <category term="community" />
    <category term="Drupal" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/personaltech/articles/2006/07/17/women_tap_the_power_of_the_blog/">buzz</a> on <a href="http://www.technorati.com/search/BlogHer.org">BlogHer</a> is booming. I think we got <a href="http://blogher.org">the main BlogHer site</a> moved to a scalable multi-server setup just in the nick of time. Kudos to our hosting partners on the BlogHer website project, <a href="http://firebright.com">Firebright</a>, for their hard work! The new setup is humming!</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://blogher.org/node/7678">BlogHer Contributing Editor Jeneane Sessum</a>, I've learned that also speaking <em>of</em> (not <em>at</em>, unfortunately) BlogHer is Shelley Powers, who's back blogging <a href="http://words.einsteinslock.com/">on</a> <a href="http://bbgun.burningbird.net/">three</a> <a href="http://scriptteaser.com/">blogs</a> (so far). (Her old flagship, <a href="http://Burningbird.com">Burningbird.com</a>, now seems to showcase some of her beautiful photography.) <a href="http://words.einsteinslock.com/invisible/one-successful-web-20-company/">Shelley has noticed</a> the incredible growing sponsor list on BlogHer's home page. The sidebar full of sponsor logos indeed has shot roots down deep 'below the fold' of the pages. (In fact, the sheer weight of the logo images was becoming a server load issue on the former hosting configuration -- a 'good problem to have,' to be sure, but still something that kept the server working harder than anticipated.)</p>
<p><a href="/image/portfolio-gallery/web-screenshots/blogher-beta"><img src="http://pingv.com/system/files/images/BlogHer-beta.thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" class="image thumbnail wrap" height="140" width="155" /></a>When we got involved with BlogHer's site development, BlogHer's web presence was basically <a href="http://surfette.typepad.com/blogher/">a Typepad blog</a> used to disseminate info about the <a href="http://blogher.org/about-blogher-conference-06">BlogHer Conference</a> '05. The new site, powered by Drupal (with some customizations), has become an incredibly robust community. And not only that, but now it's the center of <a href="http://blogher.org/advertise">a new ad network</a> that is poised to grow rapidly.</p>
<p><a href="http://words.einsteinslock.com/invisible/one-successful-web-20-company/">Shelley states</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I had originally thought of Blogher as a loosely organized non-profit formed from consensus. It wasn’t until I read the Bostom.com article and saw the list of sponsors that I realized that Blogher is actually a prime example of what it takes to be a succcessful Web 2.0 company.</p>
<p>Company co-founders, Jory Des Jardins, Elisa Camahort, and Lisa Stone have taken a grass roots effort and turned it into a <a href="http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/14623341.htm">professionally run media company</a>, with it’s own <a href="http://workerbeesblog.blogspot.com/2006/05/blogher-announces-new-business-venture.html">ad network</a>, and featured in <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=43296">Media Daily</a>, as well as various other ad and media related publications.The three are now in great demand as speakers on the issue of women in weblogging, but it won’t be long before they’ll be in demand as speakers for their success as Web 2.0 company founders.</p></blockquote>
<p>and adds, at the end:</p>
<blockquote><p>Congratulations to Blogher, the <em>company</em> and good luck with the conference next week. I have a feeling it will be the ‘it’ conference of the year.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have a feeling it won't be just the conference that will comprise the all-things-BlogHer-that-are-'it' category.</p>
<p><em>Related:  </em><em><a href="http://www.boston.com/business/personaltech/articles/2006/07/17/women_tap_the_power_of_the_blog/">Boston.com article on BlogHer</a></em></p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Taking it a step further</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/image/ideas-gallery/charts-graphs/taking-it-a-step-further" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/image/ideas-gallery/charts-graphs/taking-it-a-step-further</id>
    <published>2006-03-25T00:42:16-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-17T14:51:11-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="blogging" />
    <category term="CivicSpace" />
    <category term="community" />
    <category term="Drupal" />
    <category term="Internet" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><i>Continuing <a href="http://www.pingv.com/blog/laura/200603/so-what-is-this-web-2-0-and-how-does-drupal-fit-in">this discussion of "web 2.0"</a>....</i></p>
<p>Moving beyond <a href="http://www.pingv.com/image/ideas-gallery/charts-graphs/web-2-0-redux">the basic dynamic website model</a>, we get up into the realm of the content management system, or "CMS" -- a dynamic site where not one but several people -- thousands, even -- have direct access and ability to update and add to the website's content. This is what we create with websites powered by <a href="http://drupal.org">Drupal</a>.</p>
<p>What's appealing about CMSs like Drupal is that they can be used for just about any website, from small business to large corporation to online community to non-profit organization. Just about any organization with <i>any</i> sort of web presence can benefit from having a website where many people can participate at different levels of access.</p>
<p><br class="clear" /><br />
<a href="/image/portfolio-gallery/web-screenshots/blogher-beta"><img src="http://pingv.com/system/files/images/BlogHer-beta.thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" class="image thumbnail" height="140" width="155" /></a><br />
The power this affords, for example, to an organization like <a href="http://blogher.org">BlogHer</a> is profound. <a href="http://surfette.typepad.com/blogher">Their website last year</a> was basically just a blog. Now it is an online community with literally dozens of blogs, oodles of members and many powerful tools at their disposal to not only disseminate information but also engage people in discussions on topics spanning the globe.</p>
<p><i>Next: Multiple websites in one.</i></p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Web 2.0 redux</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/image/ideas-gallery/charts-graphs/web-2-0-redux" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/image/ideas-gallery/charts-graphs/web-2-0-redux</id>
    <published>2006-03-24T10:39:58-06:00</published>
    <updated>2006-03-24T11:28:33-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="blogging" />
    <category term="Internet" />
    <category term="Open Source" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Continuing from <a href="http://www.pingv.com/image/ideas-gallery/charts-graphs/web-1-0-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-pay-web-designers">the previous discussion</a>....</p>
<p>This chart illustrates just how much easier creating and updating websites have become: <i>you</i> are the one in charge; <i>you</i> are the one who holds the keys to the site; <i>you</i> are <i>empowered</i> to change the content to how you want it, and make those changes whenever you want. Your website doesn't sleep -- it's there to receive changes night and day.</p>
<p>This isn't to say that there never is any design involved in a web 2.0-type site -- but it's much easier, because what <a href="http://www.pingv.com">we</a> (designers) do is <a href="http://www.pingv.com/services/web-design">design your templates</a> so that <i>every new addition you make to the website content is automagically formatted to fit in with your site's overall design.</i></p>
<h3>Set up and go</h3>
<p>[img_assist|fid=4486|thumb=1|alt=The web 1.0 model]<br />
This means that the "web 1.0" phase of your new website is limited only to the initial setup, or when you want to make <i>design</i> changes to the site. (And there are always free options with pre-designed templates.) <i>Content</i> changes, updates and additions are things <i>you</i> can do on your own. (Changing your prices? Just change them! Have a new service? Just change them!)<br />
</p>
<h3>But Web 2.0 is a lot more....</h3>
<p>Because website owners are empowered to publish whenever they want, the entire nature of what websites <i>are</i> has changed. Content now has become more contemporary, more relevant -- more <i>responsive</i> to what's happening. (For example, people now write blogs.) And because websites now happen in real-time -- you write it, post it and people read it -- websites have become <i>more</i> than simply brochures....</p>
<h3>Websites are conversations....</h3>
<p><i>(More to come in the next post.)</i></p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Web 1.0 (or how I learned to stop worrying and pay web designers)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pingv.com/image/ideas-gallery/charts-graphs/web-1-0-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-pay-web-designers" />
    <id>http://pingv.com/image/ideas-gallery/charts-graphs/web-1-0-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-pay-web-designers</id>
    <published>2006-03-23T21:24:17-06:00</published>
    <updated>2006-03-24T11:14:13-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Internet" />
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>This is web 1.0, the first incarnation of the worldwide web that got beyond just basic text messaging on USENET. Basically, it is the print-design model translated to the internet.</p>
<p>The workflow is like this: </p>
<ol>
<li>You write up your web pages.</li>
<li>You give your write-up and a big bag of money to your web designer.</li>
<li>Your designer takes what you've come up with and designs your website.</li>
<li>You think he should be done by now? Think again. Maybe he has other clients to take care of first. Also, he has to be able to take breaks, doesn't he? Be patient.</li>
<li>After what may seem like forever, the design for your new web content is finished, and is passed over to the webmaster, who holds the keys to access and update your website.</li>
<li>Finally, your designed website appears....</li>
<li>...and you decide you want to rewrite that first paragraph on the home page, or maybe you find a typo....</li>
<li>...and you must go back to <b>step 1</b> and repeat the entire process.</li>
</ol>
<p>This is what you might call <i>not at all empowering</i>.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
